Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Question] _design/repl_filters #4882

Open
fr2lancer opened this issue Nov 29, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

[Question] _design/repl_filters #4882

fr2lancer opened this issue Nov 29, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@fr2lancer
Copy link

Description

Hi. it actually is not a bug report.
I just wonder how _design/repl_filters is used.(as I can't find docs of this ).

I had to file copies from couchdb 2.x to couchdb 3.3.2 due to volume of data size. and started re-indexing(by grabbing all views under all_design doc) and I was able to see hips of size of doc under _design/repl_filters

  1. What is used for? Is that a related to replication?
  2. If yes, it can be reduced once replication is done?
  3. Is that okay to delete it?

Thank you

@rnewson
Copy link
Member

rnewson commented Nov 29, 2023

Never heard of it. it's not part of couchdb.

@fr2lancer
Copy link
Author

thanks for the reply.

just I want to include this by googling it

https://lists.apache.org/api/plain?thread=dgfs5jyjt2v7zrqh4ctcg1o3pottw66h

there is 'old' source code which uses that rest api.
if it is not gonna used by any logic, I can happily delete it.

otherwise we need to consider about this.

@rnewson
Copy link
Member

rnewson commented Nov 29, 2023

Aha, thanks, that helps. I can confirm it was removed;

commit 102bcf4e07de54616fc44529792db58f482d736b
Author: Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org>
Date:   Wed Jan 8 01:01:42 2020 +0100

    feat: remove couchup (#2399)

    Co-authored-by: Joan Touzet <wohali@users.noreply.github.com>

so it is safe to delete that design document now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants