Implement Pattern Matching in the RETURN clause [Related: #1577] #1607
Labels
enhancement
New request
feature request
New feature
override-stale
To keep issues/PRs untouched from stale action
I discovered a similar grammar that has not yet been implemented in a similar vein to #1577 .
Pattern matching is also valid in return clauses.
For example, the query:
MATCH (a) RETURN (a)-[]-()
matches the variable a and returns the tuple of a and the following edge and node in a single column.
This may require a rework of the logic regarding transformation of patterns and edges and RETURN.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: