Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

μετέμελε #42

Open
vgorman1 opened this issue Dec 12, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

μετέμελε #42

vgorman1 opened this issue Dec 12, 2020 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@vgorman1
Copy link

vgorman1 commented Dec 12, 2020

The form μετέμελε goes to μεταμέλομαι with no definition given. There seems to be two problems here. Once is that μεταμέλομαι is not linked to its meaning in the LSJ. The other is that this particular form should in fact go to the entry μεταμέλει, with the impf. μετέμελε: fut. -μελήσει: aor. μετεμέλησε: (μέλω), an impersonal verb meaning it repents X (dat) of Y (gen). This latter lemma also has not meaning in Alpheios.

@balmas balmas added this to To do in 3.3.3 - Incremental via automation Dec 14, 2020
@balmas balmas self-assigned this Dec 14, 2020
@balmas
Copy link
Member

balmas commented Dec 14, 2020

will investigate.

@balmas
Copy link
Member

balmas commented Dec 15, 2020

The first (no definitions found for μετέμελε) has the same cause as alpheios-project/mjm#2 - the lemma is not in the major core+ middle liddle index. We should fix this with alpheios-project/alpheios-core#581 .

The wrong parse is a morpheus issue and should be addressed by adding this as an annotation corrections to morpheus when annotations are supported.

@balmas balmas removed this from To do in 3.3.3 - Incremental Dec 15, 2020
@balmas
Copy link
Member

balmas commented Dec 15, 2020

@vgorman1 btw, in the meantime, while we work on adding the fallback support, if you and your students can tolerate duplicate definitions, you could avoid the "no definition found" message in these scenarios (i.e. where the lemma is in the lsj index and not middle liddle) by selecting both the Major + Middle Liddell and Major + LSJ lexicons for short defintions (see attached screenshot for how to do this). The downside is that you will get duplicates, but as it seems there are MANY lemmas that are missing from the middle liddell index, I think it might be worth doing.

643375e7-b1aa-4fdd-bf6b-b7afb9dc5d91

@vgorman1
Copy link
Author

vgorman1 commented Dec 15, 2020 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants