Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

unnecessary dependency to AOSP source code #39

Open
mitp0sh opened this issue Sep 14, 2015 · 1 comment
Open

unnecessary dependency to AOSP source code #39

mitp0sh opened this issue Sep 14, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@mitp0sh
Copy link

mitp0sh commented Sep 14, 2015

hey,

I don't see the reason why you enfore the AOSP source prebuild to compile dexposed. I managed to get rid of that dependency and resolved all necessary address and objects at runtime using some quite simple heuristics and scanning techniques. Especially for Dalvik this is no problem at all considering that the development ( at least for dalvik ) is stopped. The source is not changing much anymore.

Haven't tried it but once you have a working strategy for art as well, I think it can be done here also.

Building AOSP is s pain in the a..., not talking about the time which is wasted for setup, fixing issues and so on....

It is really not too hard to remove that dependency. Sure it is additional work and will require some restructuring of the project, but it is doable for sure.

Please think about it.

Thank you!

Best regards,
mitp0sh

PS: I really love dexposed!!!!! Once of the best projects on github!! ;D

@hwjump
Copy link
Contributor

hwjump commented Sep 15, 2015

Yes, you are right. It‘s not necessary. And also I receive a PR about this, you can refer this link https://github.com/pangliang/dexposed. But there was also some flaw in this PR. ".S" file can't automatic compile in Android Studio. So I was still looking some solution for this. If you have some better ideas, We hope you can give us some clue.
Appreciate for this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants