Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Option to check blobs #32

Open
SwiftWinds opened this issue Jan 15, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Option to check blobs #32

SwiftWinds opened this issue Jan 15, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@SwiftWinds
Copy link
Contributor

SwiftWinds commented Jan 15, 2019

It would be nice to check the blobs to make sure they work. However, it would take up more space to package s0uthwest's img4tool fork with blobsaver.

@airsquared airsquared added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 16, 2019
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Apr 22, 2020
@airsquared airsquared removed the Stale label Apr 22, 2020
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Apr 22, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label May 13, 2020
@airsquared airsquared removed the Stale label May 13, 2020
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot May 13, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Jun 3, 2020
@airsquared airsquared removed the Stale label Jun 3, 2020
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jun 3, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Jun 24, 2020
@airsquared airsquared removed the Stale label Jun 24, 2020
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jun 24, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Jul 15, 2020
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jul 15, 2020
@airsquared airsquared removed the Stale label Jul 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants