Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[C language]Some questions about WGS72 and WGS84 #6

Open
Revincxt opened this issue Oct 12, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

[C language]Some questions about WGS72 and WGS84 #6

Revincxt opened this issue Oct 12, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@Revincxt
Copy link

Hello, dear author, I have some questions I'd like to ask. In the C implementation part of your project, could you please explain the differences between WGS72 and WGS84 in the SGP4 code and why WGS72 is used in the code instead of WGS84?

@aholinch
Copy link
Owner

The constants are what were selected by the original authors. I am not the original author. I give credit to CSSI as the organization that published this code. However, their web links change from time-to-time. They explain their support for WGS72 and WGS84 in their paper Revisiting Spacetrack Report 3. Their purpose, and mine as well, is to focus on compatibility with the USAF (now USSF) standard implementation of SGP4. For most applications, I believe the difference between 72 and 84 will be much less than the difference between TEME and other coordinate systems. Another paper by those authors here has a section on converting between TEME and ITRF.

@Revincxt
Copy link
Author

Okay, thank you for your answer. It's really helpful to me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants