Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE-REQUEST] Support for CKEditor Super Build #236

Open
jmnda-dev opened this issue Jul 23, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

[FEATURE-REQUEST] Support for CKEditor Super Build #236

jmnda-dev opened this issue Jul 23, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jmnda-dev
Copy link

I would like Kaffy admin to add support for CKEditor super build, which comes with a full fledged richtext editor, like this:

Screenshot from 2022-07-23 21-51-58

I had to create a custom Ecto RichTextField, add CKEditor super build CDN to Kaffy , followed this guide Running a full-featured editor from CDN and loaded the plugins config script shown in the above guide as custom javascripts, rendering the editor you see in the screenshot.

I can't load CKEditor super build under Kaffy's custom javascripts because it causes conflicts.

So my thought is since Kaffy ships with the minimal CKEditor javascript which adds support for richtext fields, it would be nice if there is an option to configure which version of CKEditor to use, or perhaps Kaffy ships with the CKEditor super build by default and allow developers to load a custom javascripts describing which plugins or widgets should appear on the editor

Would love to hear your thoughts.

@jmnda-dev jmnda-dev added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 23, 2022
@aesmail
Copy link
Owner

aesmail commented Aug 12, 2022

This would be a great addition to Kaffy 🙏🏻

I'll try to add this as soon as possible.

@jmnda-dev
Copy link
Author

jmnda-dev commented Aug 13, 2022

Awesome 🙏️! Thank you for your feedback.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants