New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Elevation data seems badly wrong #670
Comments
Hi! Tracestrack Topo contour lines are generated from recent public LiDAR data in Europe. The hillshades are generated previously with SRTM and NASADEM data. See our data source at https://www.tracestrack.com/information/#data We'll regenerate the hillshade some time later this year. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
https://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=14/51.1394/12.3867/osm-mapnik-german_style,Waymarked_Trails-Cycling&lonlats=12.376828,51.13994;12.400748,51.146846&profile=vm-forum-liegerad-schnell
I think the data is correct in so far, as the route has a lowest point around the border between Groitzsch and Neukieritzsch.
But from my experience cycling this route I seriously doubt that there is a gradient exceeding 3%. And there certainly isn't anything close to the 10–15% gradient shown in the elevation chart.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: