Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review "incorrectable" #31

Open
tucotuco opened this issue May 17, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Review "incorrectable" #31

tucotuco opened this issue May 17, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@tucotuco
Copy link
Member

tucotuco commented May 17, 2018

Formalize the criteria along with the patterns for associated error values. Incorrectable should mean that there is an irresolvable inconsistency.
Is it worth adding a flag for "unable to locate"? Right now that information is in the error field only.
Should there be a flag for "there is more than one". Right now that information is in the error field only.
Should there be a flag for "no current equivalent administrative region"? Right now that might only be in the notHigherGeography field along with things that simply are not administrative regions.
Add flag for "verified"? This could act as a double-check, meaning that everything is complete and accurate according to "opinionBy" as of the opinionDate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant