New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How to integrate XMRig version 6.21.3, I find XMRig 6.21.3 more stable #2361
Comments
I can do so for the next version, just haven't figured out what other things I should add/change yet. |
I have a few suggestions that I have written down. Some are pointless really.
I could make pull requests for some of these if you like. |
I have one feature idea too. |
Yeah might be a good idea actually, although could that increase detections? And would it then be possible to execute this file in memory without dropping it? Maybe if the file is stored as base64 string and not as a raw file? Not my best area. |
They work for me (except the maximize button since the window has a max dimension limit), are you on a normal Windows installation?
They should be different since they have differences in how they work, to make it easier to see which kind of miner you're changing/creating.
Yes that is quite difficult, for CPU mining it's possible though quite complicated. For GPU mining it might be impossible, since it's not easy to know how much GPU is being used.
The uninstaller should work correctly, I don't think there's ever been a point where it hasn't worked.
Because the administrator install needs a user agnostic directory for installation, I can add more administrator options though the options will have have to be user agnostic (not AppData, UserProfile and such).
I can do that though I don't know how much it will help, since most peoples problems with the web panel aren't from the miner side.
That's possible with some potential problems (for example where to drop the file), though using a downloader would be much better. I can add it if having no options for it (for example where to drop it, whether to execute it, whether to wait for it to finish executing, whether to remove it after running) is alright.
Yes it would definitely increase detections, injecting it would not really work since some files might be native 32-bit, some native 64-bit, some .NET assemblies and such, meaning the injector would have to account for all those scenarios (which would increase detections). So dropping it and executing it would be how it would have to be done, though where to drop it, whether to wait for dropped file to finish running or not (for example if the dropped file is some sort of antivirus disabler that should finish running before injecting the miner), and other things like that are things that would probably require a full GUI, for example like the UnamDownloader. |
If it's dropped & executed after exclusions are added, would it still alert detections for Wdefender? |
thanks |
When will the next version be released? Thanks |
How to integrate XMRig version 6.21.3, I find XMRig 6.21.3 more stable
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: