Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion - Ignore / skip ports #202

Open
J-Lucci opened this issue Jun 6, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Suggestion - Ignore / skip ports #202

J-Lucci opened this issue Jun 6, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@J-Lucci
Copy link

J-Lucci commented Jun 6, 2023

It would be nice to be able to tell Autorecon to ignore some ports - specifically if there is a port open on several machines that is used for a specific tool that may be outside the scope of an exercise. I let it run and it can end up eating a lot of time especially if it fires a dirbuster against it.

Something simple like --ignore-ports 0,1,2..10

@Tib3rius Tib3rius self-assigned this Jun 11, 2023
@Tib3rius Tib3rius added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 11, 2023
@Tib3rius
Copy link
Owner

This is an idea so obvious I can't believe I didn't implement it already. It should be relatively easy to do. I believe Nmap has an --exclude-ports option too.

That should stop the automated scanning of those ports. I'll need to code a check to handle when --force-services is used and potentially add an override.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants