Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 14, 2017. It is now read-only.

Non-functioning menu options #102

Open
patrickhlauke opened this issue Feb 16, 2016 · 11 comments
Open

Non-functioning menu options #102

patrickhlauke opened this issue Feb 16, 2016 · 11 comments

Comments

@patrickhlauke
Copy link
Contributor

Currently (2015-05-20) not functioning/returning errors:

Check > HTML Validation quick check (returns error 501)
Check > W3C HTML Validator > all sub-options (return error 500)
Check > Functional Accessibility Evaluator (site changed, does not automatically check, though still usable)

Tables > Juicy Studio Table Inspector (reports that no tables are present, even when there are tables)

Doc Info > DOM Viewer (opens a new window, but doesn't seem to show anything)

Refs > Standards and specs > HTML5 Web Developer Edition (404)
Refs > Standards and specs > ATAG 1.0 (404)
Refs > Standards and specs > Section 508 (references to refresh and the various 508.1194...) (404)

@patrickhlauke
Copy link
Contributor Author

Example of what currently happens with the "quick check"

quickcheck

@stevefaulkner
Copy link
Contributor

Check > HTML Validation quick check (returns error 501)

suggest remove

Check > W3C HTML Validator > all sub-options (return error 500)

suggest remove

Check > Functional Accessibility Evaluator (site changed, does not automatically check, though still usable)

will look into this

Tables > Juicy Studio Table Inspector (reports that no tables are present, even when there are tables)

probably needs to be pulled unlees anyone wants to fix

Doc Info > DOM Viewer (opens a new window, but doesn't seem to show anything)

suggest remove.

@patrickhlauke
Copy link
Contributor Author

re FAE see #95 - i'd say leave it as is, not much we can do at our end

@stevefaulkner
Copy link
Contributor

@patrickhlauke re FAE

below is form code from the FAE site, the fae.ws needs updating to send same info

<form action="/run/anonymous/" method="post" name="fae20_run">
    <input name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="aFtMxdBbbJxrodXwbGv0KDLkrVGE4F1M" type="hidden">

    <div class="input">
        <label for="id_url">URL</label>
        <div class="error">
        <input id="id_url" name="url" required="" value="http://" size="60" title="Example: http://somewhere.org"> 

        </div>        
    </div>

    <fieldset>


        <legend>Ruleset</legend>



        <div class="fae20_radio">
            <input id="ruleset_1" name="ruleset" value="ARIA_STRICT" checked="checked" type="radio">
            <label for="ruleset_1" title="WCAG 2.0 Level A and AA requirements using ARIA and HTML5 accessibility features.">HTML5 and ARIA Techniques</label>
        </div>

        <div class="fae20_radio">
            <input id="ruleset_2" name="ruleset" value="ARIA_TRANS" type="radio">
            <label for="ruleset_2" title="WCAG 2.0 Level A and AA requirements using legacy HTML4 features, but allowing the use of ARIA and HTML5 accessibility features.">HTML4 Legacy Techniques</label>
        </div>

    </fieldset>

<!--        
   <p>Evaluation services temporarily disabled</p>
-->
    <input name="submit" value="Evaluate" style="margin-top: 2em" type="submit">
</form>

@patrickhlauke
Copy link
Contributor Author

<input name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="aFtMxdBbbJxrodXwbGv0KDLkrVGE4F1M" type="hidden">

smells a lot like a constantly changing token (time limited?) to avoid automated submissions of the form. as such, i'm doubting that it would work to "spoof" a form submission

@stevefaulkner
Copy link
Contributor

i will ping jon gunderson

@patrickhlauke
Copy link
Contributor Author

indeed when I just visited it, the token value was uaOhYTTLtDmACTB8ObsuhIvgfzylsmte ... so this changes all the time

@patrickhlauke
Copy link
Contributor Author

and manually changing the hidden value and trying to submit the form with an invalid token brings back a 403 forbidden

capture

@patrickhlauke
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'd suggest leaving the FAE one as is, simply pointing to their front-end page. it's only a minor inconvenience having to actually copy/paste the url into their form. Or, to be blunt, it wouldn't be a big loss if FAE was removed.

@stevefaulkner
Copy link
Contributor

Or, to be blunt, it wouldn't be a big loss if FAE was removed.

it probably makes sense to do a major cull of the toolbar features for future maintenance purpose, be good to figure out what is useful and what not.

@matatk
Copy link
Contributor

matatk commented Feb 16, 2016

Funny thing is, I don't get the 5xx errors when running the ("old") HTML Validator; I wonder why.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants