Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

should iterate_affected_nodes be used ? #20

Open
lvZic opened this issue Feb 1, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

should iterate_affected_nodes be used ? #20

lvZic opened this issue Feb 1, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@lvZic
Copy link

lvZic commented Feb 1, 2023

I just want to get each frame's result, should i use iterate_affected_nodes?
in my opinion, the easiest way is get tree's all child node's position? is it?

@TheComet
Copy link
Owner

You can do it either way. This function ignores chains that weren't manipulated by the solver, for example, if you set eff->weight=0.0 on one of the effectors then that whole branch doesn't change.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants