Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Liquidity & token power for regular contributors #3281

Open
EvaMaria70 opened this issue Dec 29, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Liquidity & token power for regular contributors #3281

EvaMaria70 opened this issue Dec 29, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
Governance Governance Project improvement New feature or request

Comments

@EvaMaria70
Copy link
Contributor

As happen to some of us last month ( Nuno, myself,etc) that we didn´t have any power at the distribution event , and that the project need as much liquidity as possible right now.

Would it be a good idea that for people that is contributing regularly, meaning that are taking part at the governance system to keep the token power even when they put the tokens at the liquidity pool? Is it technically possible to do so?

We could reinforce two things with this: to promote the liquidity without neglecting the governance ( eting the contributors keep their weight power for the distribution event)
@Luis-Fernando-Molina @julian-molina @harrellbm @NAmorim

@julian-molina
Copy link
Member

I agree something of the sort is desirable.

@NAmorim NAmorim added Governance Governance Project improvement New feature or request labels Jan 5, 2022
@NAmorim
Copy link
Contributor

NAmorim commented Jan 5, 2022

I've played a bit with this on pancakeswap but the numbers do not match out. In pancakeswap I was using the percentage of the pool each account has to calculate how many tokens are "locked".
Another approach that I've thought off is to use the transactions information from BSCscan (harder) or the graph API from pancakeswap.

Anyone interested feel free to join the discussion!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Governance Governance Project improvement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants