Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Enhancement] Ability to disable spells autoformating #1411

Open
GoldRobot opened this issue Nov 12, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

[Enhancement] Ability to disable spells autoformating #1411

GoldRobot opened this issue Nov 12, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@GoldRobot
Copy link

Ваш запрос на улучшение функционала связан с проблемой?
Autoformating constantly break my spells which I use periodicaly. To turn such spells off I mark them as comment putting '//' at the start of line with spell.
So the problem is, spells longer than some treshold always get splited in 5-6 lines, so I can't then disable them when I need by just adding '//' at start of line, I forced to reformat spell back or repeat adding '//' 5-6 times more for each line.

Example, text before apply:

(#name(somethingsomething) &!#img & !#video) |  // can be disabled by putting just two //
#words(....) |
#words(...)

After apply:

(
    #name(somethingsomething) & // now requires to do 5 times more work to disable
    !#img &
    !#video
)  |
#words(....) |
#words(...)

Опишите ваше решение, которое вы хотели бы увидеть в реализаци
Simple solution - Option to disable autoformat
Overcomplicated solution but better - Rework spells completely, allowing user to create their own 'Scrolls' which contains many spells, and which can be enabled-disabled by check mark. So, I for example can create bunch of scrolls, and disable them as I need.

@GoldRobot GoldRobot added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant