Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why did I get a loss of 5e-5 after running "train_uv_modify.py", but the simulation result was particularly poor? In order to get the same result as" NS_model_train.pt", do I need to pay attention to anything else ? Thank you very much! #3

Open
uigytkilod opened this issue Nov 22, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@uigytkilod
Copy link

No description provided.

@Shengfeng233
Copy link
Owner

the loss include both data loss and equation loss, if both the data loss and equation loss are declined around 1e-5, the flow field should be well fitted (according to my experiences and the recent literature). So I suggest you may check if there was something wrong with the post processing (plotting). I think the only thing that is so tricky is the loss function, and as soon as the loss can be effectively declined, there are nothing more to pay attention to.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants