You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Given that we now support options, it would be possible to do
@reaction_networkbegin@name rn_name
...end
It doesn't really matter, both approaches work. Generally, the first one is neater. However, it is a bit funny that reaction network names is the one input type which is inputted differently compared to all other ones. Moving to the second one would allow us to have a single uniform approach.
I have no strong opinions, but at least something one can consider.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, network names are added as
Given that we now support options, it would be possible to do
It doesn't really matter, both approaches work. Generally, the first one is neater. However, it is a bit funny that reaction network names is the one input type which is inputted differently compared to all other ones. Moving to the second one would allow us to have a single uniform approach.
I have no strong opinions, but at least something one can consider.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: