Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug: launch single stack with !stack_output and --ignore-dependencies #778

Open
ngfgrant opened this issue Jul 4, 2019 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #779
Open

Bug: launch single stack with !stack_output and --ignore-dependencies #778

ngfgrant opened this issue Jul 4, 2019 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #779

Comments

@ngfgrant
Copy link
Contributor

ngfgrant commented Jul 4, 2019

There is an issue where a users attempts to launch a single stack that utilises the stack_output_resolver with the --ignore-dependencies.

With --ignore-dependencies set, any dependencies that arise through !stack_output_resolver would not be added to stack.dependencies and the next() function in StackOutput.resolve() would raise a StopIteration as the stack.dependencies list would be empty.

ngfgrant added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 4, 2019
This commit fixes an issue where a users attempts to launch a single
stack that utilises the `stack_output_resolver` with the
`--ignore-dependencies`.

Previously, with `--ignore-dependencies` set, any dependencies that arose
through `!stack_output_resolver` would not be added to
`stack.dependencies` and the `next()` function in
`StackOutput.resolve()` would raise a `StopIteration` as the
stack.dependencies list would be empty.

This commit handles the stack_output by utilising the argument passed
into `stack_output`.

[Resolves #778]
@ngfgrant ngfgrant linked a pull request Jul 4, 2019 that will close this issue
9 tasks
ngfgrant added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 4, 2019
This commit fixes an issue where a users attempts to launch a single
stack that utilises the `stack_output_resolver` with the
`--ignore-dependencies`.

Previously, with `--ignore-dependencies` set, any dependencies that arose
through `!stack_output_resolver` would not be added to
`stack.dependencies` and the `next()` function in
`StackOutput.resolve()` would raise a `StopIteration` as the
stack.dependencies list would be empty.

This commit handles the stack_output by utilising the argument passed
into `stack_output`.

[Resolves #778]
chhibber pushed a commit to chhibber/sceptre that referenced this issue Aug 20, 2019
This commit fixes an issue where a users attempts to launch a single
stack that utilises the `stack_output_resolver` with the
`--ignore-dependencies`.

Previously, with `--ignore-dependencies` set, any dependencies that arose
through `!stack_output_resolver` would not be added to
`stack.dependencies` and the `next()` function in
`StackOutput.resolve()` would raise a `StopIteration` as the
stack.dependencies list would be empty.

This commit handles the stack_output by utilising the argument passed
into `stack_output`.

[Resolves Sceptre#778]
chhibber pushed a commit to chhibber/sceptre that referenced this issue Aug 20, 2019
This commit fixes an issue where a users attempts to launch a single
stack that utilises the `stack_output_resolver` with the
`--ignore-dependencies`.

Previously, with `--ignore-dependencies` set, any dependencies that arose
through `!stack_output_resolver` would not be added to
`stack.dependencies` and the `next()` function in
`StackOutput.resolve()` would raise a `StopIteration` as the
stack.dependencies list would be empty.

This commit handles the stack_output by utilising the argument passed
into `stack_output`.

[Resolves Sceptre#778]
@tiagoasousa
Copy link

any progress on this? would say that is better to have the constrain of the region that it break?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants