Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add site-map and possibly more #32

Open
eXpl0it3r opened this issue Aug 24, 2015 · 7 comments
Open

Add site-map and possibly more #32

eXpl0it3r opened this issue Aug 24, 2015 · 7 comments

Comments

@eXpl0it3r
Copy link
Member

The help search engines we should add a site-map and possibly do more optimizations, especially regarding "deprecation" of tutorial/documentation URLs, e.g. 2.0 vs 2.3.2.

@Bromeon
Copy link
Member

Bromeon commented Aug 24, 2015

For outdated versions, we could use a redirection banner like Boost does.

Concerning 2.3.2 documentation, see my comment here.

@eXpl0it3r
Copy link
Member Author

That doesn't solve the indexing issue, which this issue has been created for.

@LaurentGomila
Copy link
Member

the indexing issue

What issue?

For outdated versions, we could use a redirection banner like Boost does.

Too bad I can't remember why I removed them. I'm sure there was a reason.

@eXpl0it3r
Copy link
Member Author

Google preferring old documentation version over newer ones.

@LaurentGomila
Copy link
Member

Ah, ok. And would a site-map solve this problem efficiently? (this is a real question, I'm not arguing)

@eXpl0it3r
Copy link
Member Author

I'm not sure, that's why I wrote "possibly". It's something I'll have to investigate and only wanted to make a note so I don't forget it.

@eXpl0it3r
Copy link
Member Author

Mostly fixed with #111
Sitemap might still be a good idea.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants