Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Help with normalization using FlowStat #37

Open
f0ng1203 opened this issue Oct 27, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Help with normalization using FlowStat #37

f0ng1203 opened this issue Oct 27, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@f0ng1203
Copy link

Hi there, my name is Yeh Fong and currently I am facing some problem using the normalization with gaussNorm.

I am using the vignette in FlowSOM package. Attached is the link: https://rdrr.io/github/saeyslab/FlowSOM_workshop/f/vignettes/FlowSOMWorkshop.Rmd

When I tried to execute #gaussNorm normalization, I have an error

"No curve with 2 landmarks was found for channel APC-Cy7-A . Decrease max.lms[ APC-Cy7-A ] and try again.
Error in extract.base.landmarks(lms$filter, channel.names, max.lms) :"

I saw elsewhere it can be solved when we transformed it with the following code

trans <- estimateLogicle(fs_batch[[1]], channels = test.chnl)
fs_batch.trans <- transform(fs_batch, trans)
fs_scaled1 <- gaussNorm(fs_batch.trans, channel.names=test.chnl)

However, when I tried that code I still face a similar problem.

fs_gaussNorm <- gaussNorm(flowset = fs_batch.trans,

  •                       channel.names = channels_of_interest,
    
  •                       peak.density.thr=0.01)
    

No curve with 2 landmarks was found for channel APC-Cy7-A . Decrease max.lms[ APC-Cy7-A ] and try again.
Error in extract.base.landmarks(lms$filter, channel.names, max.lms) :

Could you kindly advise on how I should approach this problem?

Thank you in advance.

@mikejiang
Copy link
Member

mikejiang commented Oct 27, 2021

gaussNorm normalization is no longer part of our normal workflow for data analysis, therefore it's not actively maintained and supported. For automated cell discovery and clustering,FAUST proved to be more accurate and effective.
https://www.cell.com/patterns/fulltext/S2666-3899(21)00234-8
Feel free to post to your questions there https://github.com/RGLab/FAUST
if you decide to give it a try

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants