Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

What should I do with the "NaN" values, with extremely small Pr(>Chisq) in the coef column of the summary(zlmCond) result? #168

Open
danli349 opened this issue Nov 30, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

What should I do with the "NaN" values, with extremely small Pr(>Chisq) in the coef column of the summary(zlmCond) result? #168

danli349 opened this issue Nov 30, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@danli349
Copy link

danli349 commented Nov 30, 2021 •
edited

Thanks a lot for providing such a great tool!
When I run summary(zlmCond), the result has a lot of "NaN" values, with extremely small Pr(>Chisq) in the coef column of the H and logFC components. What should I do with these values?
@danli349 danli349 changed the title What should I do with the "NaN" values, with extremely samll "Pr(>Chisq)" in the "coef" column of the "summary(zlmCond)" result? What should I do with the "NaN" values, with extremely small "Pr(>Chisq)" in the "coef" column of the "summary(zlmCond)" result? Nov 30, 2021
@danli349 danli349 changed the title What should I do with the "NaN" values, with extremely small "Pr(>Chisq)" in the "coef" column of the "summary(zlmCond)" result? What should I do with the "NaN" values, with extremely small Pr(>Chisq) in the coef column of the summary(zlmCond) result? Nov 30, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@danli349