Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Running on local network gives empty result #22

Open
dominch opened this issue Mar 13, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Running on local network gives empty result #22

dominch opened this issue Mar 13, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@dominch
Copy link

dominch commented Mar 13, 2023

Running it in local network gives empty result:
image

192.168.1.1
 / 
AS / 

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/113.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Probably same thing for other IP classes: 10.x.x.x 172.x.x.x,
Also running it locally - 127.0.x.x

Of course address/location for this service is unknown, but this looks empty and even '?' would be better :)

@PeterDaveHello
Copy link
Owner

@dominch I don't think it's really needed 😅

@dominch
Copy link
Author

dominch commented Mar 14, 2023

Looks ugly on those, of course for each You can guess missing information.

Is it needed? Sure, the whole point of such service is to get network context. With complicated setup, vpns and security You would like to know which gateway You are using, sometimes for more than one application on same network and vm. It should just give information about network route.

@PeterDaveHello
Copy link
Owner

@dominch It's Internet facing service, not for internal usage though 😱

@dominch
Copy link
Author

dominch commented Mar 14, 2023

It's network context/ip discovery service, like many others easily found in Internet, but none of them there will return information about internal network routes, and sure - I don't do that locally, but on many networks connected via different protocols and advanced routing. If I would like to know only gateway path - then no point to deploy on Your own. Ok, let's leave that.

@PeterDaveHello
Copy link
Owner

@dominch That's the purpose of the project, yes.

But, please feel free to contribute patches, we can get it merged if the complexity is acceptable, no problem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants