Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider supporting inconsistent reads for saga lookups #324

Open
danielmarbach opened this issue May 15, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Consider supporting inconsistent reads for saga lookups #324

danielmarbach opened this issue May 15, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@danielmarbach
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the suggested improvement

Currently, all non-pessimistc saga lookups are using consistent-reads. Theoretically, it would be possible to allow inconsistent reads at the cost of potentially running into more optimistic concurrency violations on contended sagas. This might be a nice cost optimization for certain scenarios.

When using pessimistic locking the record is read with an update with return results ALL therefore non-consistent reads do not apply there.

Additional Context

No response

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant