Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question:I know IronPython3 is in progress,will this work for ipy3? #1

Open
BenDerPan opened this issue Aug 6, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Comments

@BenDerPan
Copy link

This is a great work, and I know IronPython3 is in progress,will this work for ipy3?

@PMoureu
Copy link
Owner

PMoureu commented Aug 6, 2018

Glad you like it, thank you for your feedback !
I've not studied this option yet, i need to know exactly what will change with ipy3.
I have some changes in mind for iph too, to make it more flexible and allow more custom behaviors. I will try the version3 as soon as a strong release is available.

And if you have some ideas, any contribution is welcome !

@BenDerPan
Copy link
Author

@PMoureu I am reading iph source code now , and I wish to contribute for it . I extracted some of it without ui parts for a easy test, and i am try to make it work for debug (set breakpoints) ipy script in a embed C# application. I am not sure if iph support to do this. :)

my repo: IPyTracer

@PMoureu
Copy link
Owner

PMoureu commented Aug 7, 2018

i'm not sure it will perform the breakpoints as you expect in this context, it depends on how threads are handled. If your script is able to import and execute iph, it should be able to collect the objects and display the attributes, etc.. i need a small example to confirm that.

@BenDerPan
Copy link
Author

yes, in my example it can collect the objects and get the attributes, if it can run in a debug model, and break when there is a breakpoint will be perfect. However it's a tough target.

@ximuxingchen
Copy link

thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants