Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

List of current available Addons #1

Open
shazada opened this issue Aug 26, 2014 · 12 comments
Open

List of current available Addons #1

shazada opened this issue Aug 26, 2014 · 12 comments

Comments

@hi-ko
Copy link

hi-ko commented Aug 26, 2014

addons we also use to add missing features we are used from Explorer and adopted a little bit to work in production for 4.2 e/f:
https://github.com/atolcd/alfresco-share-import-export
https://github.com/atolcd/alfresco-unzip-action
https://github.com/atolcd/alfresco-spacetpl-customviews

@aviriel
Copy link
Member

aviriel commented Aug 26, 2014

Guys, let's divide lists and requirements:

  1. addons that will be included to Alfresco Honeycomb Edition
  2. list of our favorite not-obsolete good documented free open source add-ons

The first - to package into Honeycomb edition
The second one - for publishing on our website.

I think that Douglas sent the list of his favorite add-ons to publish them on the website. Not to include them to the Honeycomb edition. At least because we should form a list of requirements and start publishing addons ASAP, and we may work on new Alfresco edition for more than half of a year.

@hi-ko
Copy link

hi-ko commented Aug 26, 2014

I think it's an evolutionary process:

  • list of favorite add-ons
  • list of certified add-ons fullfilling requirements and process
  • packaged into Honeycomb edition

So we should write down and establish binding rules and requirements in the ADDONS team first, right?

@aviriel
Copy link
Member

aviriel commented Aug 26, 2014

Yep, you got it! And the first list may be much bigger than the last one. Because not all extensions are compatible with each other and some of them solve the same issue.

@hi-ko
Copy link

hi-ko commented Aug 26, 2014

Not to loose ideas, I created a wiki page with the list we have so far (not rated, tested - just suggestions)

@dgradecak
Copy link

What do you think about server side addons? I wrote a nice to have spring MVC integration for Alfresco. So, instead of writing webscripts with descriptors and ftls, one can simply use spring mvc (json as default output).

So there is no Share integration, but it is an AMP that exposes a single /mvc/* webscript and uses spring to process the call. Works in production on EE and CE (many versions). That helps me to be quite productive.

https://github.com/dgradecak/alfresco-mvc/tree/dev

@hi-ko
Copy link

hi-ko commented Aug 26, 2014

Cadidates of our favorite free open source add ons
(The ticket system seems not to support wiki-like links or I was not able to find out to cross reference without using hard, real http links)

@AFaust
Copy link
Contributor

AFaust commented Aug 26, 2014

Tahir also started a ticket (#2) about requirements for addons (concerning Heikos comment about binding rules).

@hi-ko
Copy link

hi-ko commented Aug 26, 2014

@dgradecak we should be open for any open improvement/extension
I think your module needs a separate thread to find out if and how this could be of value for fellowers.
I can add it to the list and we discuss/decide later

@shazada
Copy link
Author

shazada commented Aug 26, 2014

I agree with @hi-ko, it's more a development process improvement. And we should decide it later on.

@douglascrp
Copy link
Contributor

I've just created a new repository to host a project I've helped to port to Alfresco 4.2
https://github.com/douglascrp/alfresco-share-site-logo-customization

@hubick
Copy link

hubick commented Mar 14, 2019

I wanted to let someone somewhere know I did this, so I'll comment here.
https://github.com/AthabascaUniversity/alfresco-jcr

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants