Improve camera documentation

[kevinlinxc]

https://openhd.gitbook.io/open-hd/hardware/cameras

This page has poor user experience, and is possibly outdated?

1. There's unused whitespace, but you have to scroll on the tables, you have to hide the camera brand to see the rating
2. The blurb under ** says that the top 3 cameras are recommended. Does that mean the 3 physically located at the top of the first table? If they are the recommended ones, why do they have the same rating as the other 11 ** cameras? Are all of the ** cameras equally good and the blurb is just outdated?
3. An S,A,B,C,D tier list system or 5 * rating system would be a lot more clear. A short description of the pros and cons of using each camera and why they deserve a rating would also be helpful
4. The other cameras besides the first table don't have ratings
5. There's a Thermal/USB cameras section and a USB cameras section. Is the former supposed to be "Thermal USB cameras"?

[raphaelscholle]

Thanks for your request. I did the "simple" thing and removed the stars at all, they're not really helpful.
The ideal fix would be making pictures or test videos, but I really don't have the time for that, there is just to much to do in OpenHD.

The first 3 cameras of the table are the ones the dev-team tests with and are simply the recommended ones. Better discriptions would actually be a very good idea, but currently nothing the dev-team can work on because we're pretty overworked with more important stuff.

The thermal camera-section also needs to be worked on, some of them are just not recommended. Same goes for the usb-cameras.

If there is somebody who want's to work on that I'm happy to help