Merge with 'yuma123'.

[Dr0m0k]

I'm very interested in using your library.
I especially like that you start process of re-branding.
But I'm missing some features like usage of 'autotools', 'anyxml' support, etc.
That present in another YUMA fork, it's called 'yuma123' and you can find it by
following link: http://sourceforge.net/p/yuma123 .
Could you please consider possibility to merge changes from this project?
This process should be pretty straightforward because both projects based on
the same 2.2.5 version of original YUMA library.

[AndrewStoneOpenClovis]

Hmm... I was not aware of that fork. I'd just deprecate this one in favor
of that one except the name, etc does not make me think they are
necessarily that serious about providing a stable repo for Yuma
derivatives.

Since you clearly want and need these additional tools (and know how they
should behave), would you like to do the merge?

Thanks!
Andrew

On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Dr0m0k notifications@github.com wrote:

I'm very interested in using your library.
I especially like that you start process of re-branding.
But I'm missing some features like usage of 'autotools', 'anyxml' support,
etc.
That present in another YUMA fork, it's called 'yuma123' and you can find
it by
following link: http://sourceforge.net/p/yuma123 .
Could you please consider possibility to merge changes from this project?
This process should be pretty straightforward because both projects based
on
the same 2.2.5 version of original YUMA library.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/1
.