Thoughts on a webhook for actions? #130
Closed
mcdowellster
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 3 comments
-
Hey, I think #70 covers this - could you add your comments there? I'm interested to know how people would use this / what they need. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
It's mostly about simply running an action without the interface OR curl.
Ideally I'd have a link say: http://localhost:1337/action?sending
Simple and totally amazing on a document where an end-user could run a
command without "running a command" :)
…On Fri, Mar 24, 2023, 5:43 p.m. James Read ***@***.***> wrote:
Hey, I think #30 <#30> covers
this - could you add your comments there? I'm interested to know how people
would use this / what they need.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#130 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWXDW2WYL6GRFP4QCJCCIHDW5YIRZANCNFSM6AAAAAAV7FZKAU>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
This is now implemented :-) https://docs.olivetin.app/api-start-action.html#api-eg-startIdUrl |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I'd love to slap a link in documentation that can be clicked which can run an action instead of doing a post method :)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions