Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about error rate for correction #196

Open
mylena-s opened this issue Nov 29, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Question about error rate for correction #196

mylena-s opened this issue Nov 29, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mylena-s
Copy link

Hello! thank you for developing NextDenovo, it is working perfectly for me.
I am writing to ask you a question about the parameters for the run.

I am working with ONT reads, mostly obtained using the V14 chemistry of the R10.4.1 flowcells. The median quality of the reads is 20, and there is a high proportion of ultra long reads with lengths above 100Kbp, up to 800Kbp.

I also have other datasets obtained with the previous ONT flowcells that have a higher error rate. When I compare the results of the assemblies obtained with both technologies (but similar coverages), I find higher N50s for the older flowcells (12Mb vs. 6 Mb).

I know this could be coincidental, but I was wondering if there is any parameter that I could modify to account for the lower error rate or larger reads, and therefore improve assembly?

Thank you in advance!

Mylena

@moold
Copy link
Member

moold commented Dec 6, 2023

You could try increasing the value of -k -w in minimap2_options_raw and minimap2_options_cns, I'm not sure if that will improve the assembly, but it will definitely introduce the running time.

@moold moold added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants