Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Glycan identification in "combined_modified_peptide.tsv" file #1224

Open
mwfoster opened this issue Aug 24, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Glycan identification in "combined_modified_peptide.tsv" file #1224

mwfoster opened this issue Aug 24, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@mwfoster
Copy link

Hi,

We are performing glycopeptide identification and quantification across many samples. The data in the "assigned modifications" column of the "combined_modified_peptide.tsv" file gives only the mass of the glycan, not the ID. I gather from a previous post that the "psm.tsv" contains the information to connect the "assigned modification" to the "observed modification" that would be found in the glycan database. However, since the psm.tsv is specific to a sample, this could require performing this lookup on a large number of psm.tsv files. Is there an easier way to do this, or could you modify the "combined_modified_peptide.tsv" to include the best match to the glycan database?

Thanks,

Matt

@dpolasky
Copy link
Member

Hi Matt,

There is not an easier way to do this at the moment, unfortunately. I think we could add the Observed Modifications column to the combined_modified_peptide.tsv @fcyu? Or we may need to discuss internally the best way to propagate the glycan information.

Best,
Dan

@fcyu
Copy link
Member

fcyu commented Aug 24, 2023

Yes, we can let IonQuant take that information and propagate to the combined table.

Best,

Fengchao

@fcyu fcyu self-assigned this Aug 24, 2023
@fcyu fcyu added the IonQuant label Aug 24, 2023
@mwfoster
Copy link
Author

Thanks. That would be very helpful. Regards, Matt

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants