Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Curtailment showing as zero-revenue grid sales #384

Open
zolanaj opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Curtailment showing as zero-revenue grid sales #384

zolanaj opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@zolanaj
Copy link
Collaborator

zolanaj commented May 2, 2024

In some cases, results exhibit grid exports at zero revenue instead of curtailment when the latter is the appropriate results.

The proposed fix is to fix dvProductionToGrid=0 in any period-tier pairing in which the 'cost' (a negative number to indicate a benefit) is equal to zero.

@adfarth
Copy link
Collaborator

adfarth commented May 3, 2024

@Bill-Becker Daniel had mentioned the other day that you two were working on a project in which it would be beneficial to have exports without compensation, to account for the emissions offset. Should we discuss this behavior as a group?

@Bill-Becker
Copy link
Collaborator

@adfarth @zolanaj we were using a previous version of REopt.jl, before the Big M implementation, and we WERE seeing curtailment instead of zero-value export. We did not do anything to change this. Our workaround was just to assign a smaller value to the wholesale/export rate. So it seems like maybe the Big M updates now allow export at zero value instead of curtailment?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants