Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

better big-M for net metering #382

Closed
zolanaj opened this issue May 1, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #383
Closed

better big-M for net metering #382

zolanaj opened this issue May 1, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #383

Comments

@zolanaj
Copy link
Collaborator

zolanaj commented May 1, 2024 •
edited

The net metering model is off without indicator constraints - the following JSON results in 30 kW of PV, the net metering limit, when Xpress is used and 62 kW when HiGHS is used due to a large default big-M in the interconnect limit.
nem_q.json
@zolanaj zolanaj linked a pull request May 2, 2024 that will close this issue
Improve net-metering big-m constraint #383
Merged
@zolanaj
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zolanaj commented May 13, 2024

Addressed in #383, now in v0.46.0

@zolanaj zolanaj closed this as completed May 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Improve net-metering big-m constraint NREL/REopt.jl
1 participant
@zolanaj