You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
multipoolminer seems to be reading inflated hashrates from gminer. Unsure where the culprit is. I cannot see the inflated values reported in the mining log.
Here's an example displayed in the main window:
"WARNING: Stat file (Gminer-v1.96-1xGeForceGTX10708GB_Cuckaroom_HashRate) was not updated because the value (104.809736842105) is outside fault tolerance (3 to 4).
WARNING: Stat file (Gminer-v1.96-3xGeForceGTX1070Ti8GB_Cuckaroom_PowerUsage) was not updated because the value (374.261258690446) is outside fault tolerance (423 to 517).
WARNING: Stat file (Gminer-v1.96-3xGeForceGTX1070Ti8GB_Cuckaroom_HashRate) was not updated because the value (66002.1025925926) is outside fault tolerance (9 to 11).
WARNING: Stat file (SRBMinerMulti-v0.3.1-1xCeleronG3930290GHz_YescryptR32_HashRate) was not updated because the value (44.1463333392333) is outside fault tolerance (66 to 80).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
multipoolminer seems to be reading inflated hashrates from gminer. Unsure where the culprit is. I cannot see the inflated values reported in the mining log.
Here's an example displayed in the main window:
"WARNING: Stat file (Gminer-v1.96-1xGeForceGTX10708GB_Cuckaroom_HashRate) was not updated because the value (104.809736842105) is outside fault tolerance (3 to 4).
WARNING: Stat file (Gminer-v1.96-3xGeForceGTX1070Ti8GB_Cuckaroom_PowerUsage) was not updated because the value (374.261258690446) is outside fault tolerance (423 to 517).
WARNING: Stat file (Gminer-v1.96-3xGeForceGTX1070Ti8GB_Cuckaroom_HashRate) was not updated because the value (66002.1025925926) is outside fault tolerance (9 to 11).
WARNING: Stat file (SRBMinerMulti-v0.3.1-1xCeleronG3930290GHz_YescryptR32_HashRate) was not updated because the value (44.1463333392333) is outside fault tolerance (66 to 80).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: