You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, Prof.cragwhite
I'am learning OpenFOAM-2.4.0-MNF now,some questions about tutorials/dsmcfoamplus/collisionRateTest,I run this tutorial without any changes,the simulation results not same as Aanlytical results.but simulation results/Aanlytical results always equal to sqrt(2).I want to know why.It's because of consider the relative velocity between molecules?
sorry to distrub you,and thank you very much for your answers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm not able to replicate this. Using Equation 4.78 from Bird's 1994 book, I calculate a collision rate of 3.580656e22 per unit volume per unit time for the oxygen gas as set up in the tutorial case. The measurement class returns a value of 3.5803527292e+22 per unit volume per unit time, which gives a difference of 0.0085%. Have you double checked your calculation of the analytical solution?
I'm not able to replicate this. Using Equation 4.78 from Bird's 1994 book, I calculate a collision rate of 3.580656e22 per unit volume per unit time for the oxygen gas as set up in the tutorial case. The measurement class returns a value of 3.5803527292e+22 per unit volume per unit time, which gives a difference of 0.0085%. Have you double checked your calculation of the analytical solution?
First,Thanks for your answers,it's very helpful to me.
By the way ,coud I learn more about collisionRateTest?such as boundary conditions and simulation process .
Hi, Prof.cragwhite
I'am learning OpenFOAM-2.4.0-MNF now,some questions about tutorials/dsmcfoamplus/collisionRateTest,I run this tutorial without any changes,the simulation results not same as Aanlytical results.but simulation results/Aanlytical results always equal to sqrt(2).I want to know why.It's because of consider the relative velocity between molecules?
sorry to distrub you,and thank you very much for your answers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: