You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I made some simulations on the Couette flow using the dsmcCLLWallPatch and was wondering about unphysical results.
After regarding the input files several times I looked into the code dsmcCLLWallPatch.C and there is a mistake regarding the TMAC for the tangential wall velocity in lines 249 and 250 concerning the alphaT with the definition in line 152:
const scalar& alphaT = tangentialAccommodationCoefficient_*(2.0 - tangentialAccommodationCoefficient_);
The tangential wall velocity must be multiplied by tangentialAccommodationCoefficient_ not by alphaT. Otherwise the simulated wall velocity is unphysically increased. I did simulations with both the dsmcMixedDiffuseSpecularWallPatch and the CLL model. After the correction I got similar results with both models on the trivial case of an isothermal Couette flow. Before this correction the results of the CLL model could generate a higher mass flow rate than can be indicated by the wall speed. I give a snipped of the current code and my proposal of the correction below from lines 245 to 252:
Hello,
I made some simulations on the Couette flow using the dsmcCLLWallPatch and was wondering about unphysical results.
After regarding the input files several times I looked into the code dsmcCLLWallPatch.C and there is a mistake regarding the TMAC for the tangential wall velocity in lines 249 and 250 concerning the alphaT with the definition in line 152:
const scalar& alphaT = tangentialAccommodationCoefficient_*(2.0 - tangentialAccommodationCoefficient_);
The tangential wall velocity must be multiplied by tangentialAccommodationCoefficient_ not by alphaT. Otherwise the simulated wall velocity is unphysically increased. I did simulations with both the dsmcMixedDiffuseSpecularWallPatch and the CLL model. After the correction I got similar results with both models on the trivial case of an isothermal Couette flow. Before this correction the results of the CLL model could generate a higher mass flow rate than can be indicated by the wall speed. I give a snipped of the current code and my proposal of the correction below from lines 245 to 252:
Current code:
U = UNormal + UTangential1 + UTangential2;
Corrected Code:
U = UNormal + UTangential1 + UTangential2;
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: