Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate better ways to access a Membase backend #10

Open
jkoshy opened this issue Apr 11, 2011 · 0 comments
Open

Investigate better ways to access a Membase backend #10

jkoshy opened this issue Apr 11, 2011 · 0 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@jkoshy
Copy link
Contributor

jkoshy commented Apr 11, 2011

The code currently accesses membase in memcache compatibility mode. This is sub-optimal in a couple of ways:

  • Traffic to the membase is routed through a proxy (moxi), which implies an additional hop for data to traverse.
  • The python client used by the current server does not deal with all the error responses that a membase server could issue.
  • The memcache protocol itself has limits that the membase does not have.

Choose and use a suitable interface library so that a Membase backend can be accessed efficiently.

@ghost ghost assigned jkoshy Apr 11, 2011
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant