Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Binding of Dataspace Protocol to TMForum APIs #144

Open
ssteinbuss opened this issue Aug 17, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

New Binding of Dataspace Protocol to TMForum APIs #144

ssteinbuss opened this issue Aug 17, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
Best Practices Best Practices collection for the Dataspace Protocol documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@ssteinbuss
Copy link
Member

ssteinbuss commented Aug 17, 2023

The TMForum APIs are widely used and adopted in the TelCo Domain. An additional Binding of the Dataspace Protocol to the TMForum APIs should be considered.
First thoughts on binding are available in this slide deck.

@ssteinbuss
Copy link
Member Author

This is about the potential of TMForum to implement the Dataspace Protocol.

The Dataspace Protocol Specification should remain unchanged, but a clear description how the TMForum APIs can be used to realize and implement the Dataspace Protocol.

This should start now in the Best Practices area.

@ssteinbuss ssteinbuss added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Best Practices Best Practices collection for the Dataspace Protocol labels Aug 24, 2023
@jimmarino
Copy link
Contributor

The slides strike me more as a discussion of a particular DSP implementation, not a DSP binding to a transport. DSP bindings define how abstract protocol messages map to a particular transport such as HTTP, MQTT, etc. They don't define new concepts or message exchange patterns.

An analog to a DSP binding is a WSDL Binding.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Best Practices Best Practices collection for the Dataspace Protocol documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants