You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The PModel environment module takes in environmental forcing variables (tc, patm, co2, vpd) and produce photosynthesis variables (ca, kmm, gammastar, ns_star). There are hard bounds on the forcing variables values that should ideally not generate any photosynthsis variables that are out of bound within their own ranges.
We need to check if there are any cases where the valid forcing variables produce any out-of-bound outputs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The co2 to ca conversion is very straightforward, then kmm, gammastar and ns_star are complex functions of tc and patm only. vpd is passed straight through to the OptimalChiABC subclasses. So using np.meshgrid to get some inputs for combinations of tc and patm should do it. I think it's very likely that the random values of the forcing variables within bounds selected in the benchmarking data would fill that grid space pretty well, but this would be more explicit.
Fixed in #153
The PModel environment module takes in environmental forcing variables (
tc
,patm
,co2
,vpd
) and produce photosynthesis variables (ca
,kmm
,gammastar
,ns_star
). There are hard bounds on the forcing variables values that should ideally not generate anyphotosynthsis variables
that are out of bound within their own ranges.We need to check if there are any cases where the valid forcing variables produce any out-of-bound outputs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: