You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the @IAMconsortium/common-definitions-emissions task team, we are discussing how to account for emissions and removals from land-related processes.
We already explicitly have a variable for net LULUCF flux and carbon sequestration on land (which will be elaborated on). This implies that we should also be able to report a net positive carbon flux on land as well. We would propose to do so in similar land categories as are currently used elsewhere.
Thoughts and opinions welcome @IAMconsortium/common-definitions-land
In the @IAMconsortium/common-definitions-emissions task team, we are discussing how to account for emissions and removals from land-related processes.
We already explicitly have a variable for net LULUCF flux and carbon sequestration on land (which will be elaborated on). This implies that we should also be able to report a net positive carbon flux on land as well. We would propose to do so in similar land categories as are currently used elsewhere.
Thoughts and opinions welcome @IAMconsortium/common-definitions-land
cc @strefler / @jayfuhrman
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: