You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The rationale was simply to enforce that negative integral values for month are never represented (ditto for day), while they are for year. It was realized that this design choice had a small cost in terms of homogeneity. And that was weighed against the small benefit of enforcing lack of negative values for month and day. I recognized this as a small-cost / small-benefit design decision and landed with where it is today.
Quick question:
Might you tell me the reasoning behind
day
andmonth
types being cast tounsigned
, whileyear
types are cast toint
?Thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: