We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Code like:
const requestBody: SubscribeRequest = request.body as SubscribeRequest; const emailAddress: string | undefined = requestBody.emailAddress; const isStaff: boolean = hasStaffPerms(payload);
can be simplified to:
const requestBody = request.body as SubscribeRequest; const emailAddress = requestBody.emailAddress; const isStaff = hasStaffPerms(payload);
This makes TypeScript needlessly verbose and ruins the point of typescript in the first place - safety without the pain of it.
Most modern editors will show the inferred types if you hover over the variable or they can be explicitly shown if you want.
This is another issue that will conflict with anything, but this code is ugly and makes typescript more painful then it needs to be.
We can probably use something like no-unnecessary-type-assertion to fix this going forward.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Timothy-Gonzalez
No branches or pull requests
Code like:
can be simplified to:
This makes TypeScript needlessly verbose and ruins the point of typescript in the first place - safety without the pain of it.
Most modern editors will show the inferred types if you hover over the variable or they can be explicitly shown if you want.
This is another issue that will conflict with anything, but this code is ugly and makes typescript more painful then it needs to be.
We can probably use something like no-unnecessary-type-assertion to fix this going forward.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: