Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't assume specific filenames in supplemental data #6

Open
srl295 opened this issue Mar 14, 2013 · 1 comment
Open

Don't assume specific filenames in supplemental data #6

srl295 opened this issue Mar 14, 2013 · 1 comment

Comments

@srl295
Copy link

srl295 commented Mar 14, 2013

http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/#Supplemental_Data states this now, and the upcoming revision will hopefully make this even more clear: One should not assume any specific filenames used under supplemental, according to the LDML spec.

In other words, don't open dayPeriods.xml expecting day periods and only day periods, or supplementalData.xml expecting specific other data. Logically, you should open the entire supplemental data directory and merge the XML trees together, and use the resolved tree for access to supplemental data.

@GuySmithFerrier
Copy link
Owner

Thanks. I will resolve this in a future release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants