Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Current MIT-License does not suit QGIS Plugin License Requirements #228

Open
koebi opened this issue Feb 16, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Current MIT-License does not suit QGIS Plugin License Requirements #228

koebi opened this issue Feb 16, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@koebi
Copy link
Collaborator

koebi commented Feb 16, 2024

Accoding to the Licensing requirements for QGIS plugins, QGIS plugins should comply with GPL version 2 or greater.

Following the discussion in this QEP, license files will become mandatory as of June 1st, 2024.

Therefore, we will have to switch to GPL version 2 or greater, and I'd propose using GPL version 3. The current MIT-License is compatible with this, so re-licensing the code is feasible.

This issue exists mainly to inform all our contributors about this change, so they can voice their concerns (if any).
Tagging @nilsnolde @merydian @TheGreatRefrigerator @mattamach @m-kuhn @jannefleischer @kcrkor for this.

@nilsnolde
Copy link
Contributor

I might be wrong but IMO this is a non-issue, MIT is perfectly compatible with GPL. It doesn’t mean that this plugin is re-licensing QGIS code. It just means that the code written in this plugin can be used in a MIT way unless otherwise restricted, e.g. PyQGIS via GPL.

While we’re on the topic: GIScience doesn’t even comply with the very little licensing restrictions MIT requires hahaha you removed my copyright! I don’t easily take offense, but that’s a big NO NO.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants