Replace 'Virtus' with 'dry-types' for Coercion

[ChristianClassen]

Hey,

first of all, thanks for writing this great gem!
Are there any plans to replace the 'Virtus' dependency with the much better maintained dry-types coercion engine? (Same creator)
It's even the default coercion backend for the Trailblazer architecture.

Btw, the creator of Virtus explains why he started developing the dry-types gem: Virtus to be abandoned by its creator?

Would love to hear your thoughts about it.

[ramontayag]

Hello @b2e9f523 - glad you find it useful!

I'm familiar with the Dry gems and use them for other projects. I considered moving but dry-types is not 1.x yet. I'm concerned with breaking changes.

I don't see any reason other than that. It seems the feature set storext needs can be found in dry-types. Perhaps we can keep this open until dry-rb reaches 1.x?

[ChristianClassen]

Yes, better wait until dry-types is mature enough to rely on without facing breaking changes.

[FunkyloverOne]

The time has come 🎉
https://dry-rb.org/news/2019/04/23/dry-types-and-dry-struct-1-0-0-released/

Also, they will release dry-validation and dry-schema 1.0.0 soon, if those might be needed here as well.

[ramontayag]

That's great!

If anyone wants to take a look at upgrading, please do - I won't be able to do so for a while. All the conversion happens through a proxy object that is created per class that uses Storext.

[swrobel]

FYI, virtus 2.0 was just released. It seems that this gem's dependency on it is unbounded, so compatibility could possibly be broken by this major version bump.