Skip to content

Is skipping sesman now an intended feature? #10021

Answered by akallabeth
metcalsr28 asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

no, just the syntax changed slightly to distinguish between we want no credentials and we just did not supply some.
add /u: /p: (empty credentials) and you will get the logon manager (if you have TLS or RDP security, will just fail with NLA of course)

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@metcalsr28
Comment options

Answer selected by metcalsr28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants