Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question on data NaN value #118

Open
MingCongSu opened this issue Jan 16, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Question on data NaN value #118

MingCongSu opened this issue Jan 16, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@MingCongSu
Copy link

MingCongSu commented Jan 16, 2024

When I run cal_mean_variance.ipynb, one of the data (007975.npy) and its mirror version (M007975.npy) contain much NaN value, which leads to a tiny double-check difference in double-check steps.

Execution result of cal_mean_variance.ipynb:
image

HumanML3D\new_joint_vecs\007975.npy is like:
image

Is this okay or did I do something wrong?

@EricGuo5513
Copy link
Owner

EricGuo5513 commented Jan 16, 2024 via email

@MingCongSu
Copy link
Author

MingCongSu commented Jan 17, 2024

Hi @EricGuo5513, thanks for replying to me.
The shape of this data matrix (HumanML3D\new_joint_vecs\007975.npy) is (84, 263).
In my environment, the versions of numpy==1.21.6 and scipy==1.7.3 .

@EricGuo5513
Copy link
Owner

I saw the numpy version used for creating this dataset is 1.18.5. Not sure if this makes big difference. Please email me at cguo2@ualberta.ca if this does not work.

@MingCongSu
Copy link
Author

I reinstalled the numpy==1.18.5 but the result is the same.

I checked the result before running motion_representation.ipynb and producing new_joint_vecs and new_joints, which is the npy in /joints, but it seems normal?

007975.npy M007975.npy
image image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants