Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Functional connectivity methods are asymmetric #22

Open
olivercliff opened this issue Jun 6, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Functional connectivity methods are asymmetric #22

olivercliff opened this issue Jun 6, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@olivercliff
Copy link

Hi all,

When using this dataset, we found that the following methods (that are named as functional on the main page) yield directed values:
coherence_phase
phase_locking_value
phase_lag_index
weighted_phase_lag_index

The dataset has brain regions on the first axis and time dimension on the second (so it should be transposed before inputting to the toolkit).

Any ideas?

@edeno
Copy link
Contributor

edeno commented Jun 10, 2022

You are correct about these measures being asymmetric. They are typically used for functional connectivity by taking the absolute value or magnitude of the signal. Since they can be used either way, I chose to leave them in their complex form to leave that choice to the user. I should be more explicit in the documentation about this.

@olivercliff
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your response, Eric. It seems that only the phase_locking_value method is complex though (the rest are floats). Should the other ones also be asymmetric/complex?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants