Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BungeeCord #34

Open
HeroCC opened this issue Aug 17, 2016 · 44 comments
Open

BungeeCord #34

HeroCC opened this issue Aug 17, 2016 · 44 comments
Labels
Ascension: Planned Planned for implementation in DiscordSRV v2 (Ascension) enhancement platform

Comments

@HeroCC
Copy link

HeroCC commented Aug 17, 2016

Hello!

I currently run a BungeeCord server, and would love to integrate with discord. However, I don't want to put DiscordSRV in every server, and would rather just to put it in bungee. I use VentureChat, so it's integration drew me to this plugin vs others that support bungee but not VC.

If you have no plans for BungeeCord that is fine, but it'd be nice to have one less plugin to put in every server / sync configs.

Thanks!

@Scarsz
Copy link
Member

Scarsz commented Aug 17, 2016

I would but honestly a grand total of two people want this, there's just no
motivation to make it currently

On Wednesday, August 17, 2016, HeroCC notifications@github.com wrote:

Hello!

I currently run a BungeeCord server, and would love to integrate with
discord. However, I don't want to put DiscordSRV in every server, and would
rather just to put it in bungee. I use VentureChat, so it's integration
drew me to this plugin vs others that support bungee but not VC.

If you have no plans for BungeeCord that is fine, but it'd be nice to have
one less plugin to put in every server / sync configs.

Thanks!


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#34, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHVe1HBx3t0aHb7deXY0OJzepAidVGDQks5qg0XHgaJpZM4Jmsh0
.

@HeroCC
Copy link
Author

HeroCC commented Aug 17, 2016

That's OK. If you ever change your mind, know that it would be appreciated!

@Scarsz
Copy link
Member

Scarsz commented Aug 17, 2016

it's not a no, it's just a rather low priority right now for me

On Wednesday, August 17, 2016, HeroCC notifications@github.com wrote:

That's OK. If you ever change your mind, know that it would be appreciated!


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#34 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHVe1E5uKM-N2W4GeaSryS5aUO-SLXqqks5qg1CtgaJpZM4Jmsh0
.

@Scarsz Scarsz added this to the v13 milestone Sep 1, 2016
@SequaciousGAMES
Copy link

Even though it's in the development queue I'd like to say I'm holding out for this feature too

@Eufranio
Copy link
Contributor

Same.

@RedAISkye
Copy link

I'm running Bungeecord server as well so I request for this feature as well.

@AaronMcHale
Copy link

+1

Also HeroChat Integration could continue in a Bungee version with https://www.spigotmc.org/resources/herochatbungeebridge-bungee.189/

@Carisus
Copy link

Carisus commented Jan 10, 2017

I would like to see Bungee support as well. The Ability to see which server they are talking from without setting up multiple Discord channels would be a major plus.

@haugsvar
Copy link

I second a Bungee version

@Scarsz Scarsz modified the milestones: v14.0, v13.0 Jan 31, 2017
@Goofables
Copy link

I agree. This would be a nice feature

@Scarsz Scarsz changed the title BungeeCord Integration BungeeCord Apr 9, 2017
@Scarsz Scarsz added the platform label Apr 9, 2017
@jonthesquirrel
Copy link

This would be invaluable for me. Especially since one of my servers behind bungee is vanilla, and a bungeecord-only discord plugin is the only option.

@danbracey
Copy link

Same. I found that doing /discord link works in my creative server but doesn't carry over to my survival server as it's two seperate plugins. Please put this in!

@Ry-DS
Copy link

Ry-DS commented Jun 22, 2017

I was looking into developing a completely new plugin called Disgot that provided Bungeecord support, but instead of making a whole new plugin, should I instead make a fork addressing this issue? @Scarsz

Or are you planning to integrate it at ver 15?

@Scarsz
Copy link
Member

Scarsz commented Jun 22, 2017

@SimplyBallistic If you want to contribute to DiscordSRV instead it would be much appreciated, PM me on Discord https://scarsz.me/discord

@SuperRonanCraft
Copy link

I would love to support this idea, the only bungeecord to discord only involves login and logout times, not the actual console log or commands

@FixTheAdmin
Copy link

I love would love this feature as well!

@Ry-DS
Copy link

Ry-DS commented Jul 16, 2017

Im having trouble understanding what is needed. What exactly would a bungee cord version do? What should it do? What should it do compared to the current version. The current version seems fine to me.

@SuperRonanCraft
Copy link

SuperRonanCraft commented Jul 16, 2017

@SimplyBallistic it would do the same thing as the Bukkit/Spigot version would do, just on Bungeecord, it would send the console, but just remove the chat channels, basically a console only version? I just like the idea of having all consoles connected on discord without having to go to your hosts platform to restart,stop or execute command. I don't know about you, but it would open doors to quick and easy developing for other developers who work on networks but whose server owners don't want then to have file access or change settings, just execute commands on the console on Discord.
Take a look at DiscordBot it only sends messages on players joining/leaving, but nothing else, I would love to see DiscordSRV have bungeecord support :)

@HeroCC
Copy link
Author

HeroCC commented Jul 16, 2017

I feel like there are other ways to have a portable console, without using discord. A discord plugin without chat would seem pretty pointless.

My idea was it would be pretty much the same (integrating with chat plugins, console, and leave joins) but it would only be installed on BungeeCord, instead of each single spigot. Maybe allow routing different bungee connected servers to different channels in discord?

@moeKiwiSAMA
Copy link

It will be a nice feature if it support bungeecord

@Ry-DS
Copy link

Ry-DS commented Jul 17, 2017

@HeroCC @SuperRonanCraft Ok, I understand what you mean. I'll implement it into my fork!

@xDeeKay
Copy link

xDeeKay commented Nov 6, 2017

+1 for BungeeCord support.

@RihanArfan
Copy link

+1 also maybe integrate with DeluxeChat Bungee.

@RedAISkye
Copy link

Been 1 year since the Bungeecord support request and it has still not been developed?

@Scarsz
Copy link
Member

Scarsz commented Nov 8, 2017

For every comment this issue gets, this will be delayed by a month

@RedAISkye
Copy link

Meh, It's been 4 months that I'm taking Java classes so when I'm skilled enough, I'll do it myself for my own personal use.

@RedAISkye
Copy link

At first you said "I would but honestly a grand total of two people want this, there's just no
motivation to make it currently" and now when more people want this then you're making it low priority.
I don't have any hope for this anymore.

@xDeeKay
Copy link

xDeeKay commented Nov 9, 2017

I too figured the more people that asked for this the greater chance there would be. Guess pizza can't buy everything.

@RedAISkye
Copy link

@xDeeKay Well, that's what was said by the developer in the past but I guess, he lied.

@BillyGalbreath
Copy link
Contributor

I guess you guys are unaware Scarz is in the process of a big move. His new place isn't even fully furnished yet. Give it some time. This is in the works, along with forge support as well. You should check the other branches in this repo before slinging shit around the place. ;)

@RedAISkye
Copy link

@BillyGalbreath Yeah buy why did he say that he'll delay this more if someone comments on here? He could've just said to give him time as he's busy with life.

@BillyGalbreath
Copy link
Contributor

Because it's annoying as hell and stressful. This isn't a job for him, it's a side project/hobby he does in his down time. Imagine if the tables were turned. ;)

@xDeeKay
Copy link

xDeeKay commented Nov 9, 2017

It's annoying as hell to receive support for a feature well sought after? News to me.

@BillyGalbreath
Copy link
Contributor

Oh, and not to mention the bot works as-is on bungee environments. The requested support in this ticket is simply moving the workload from the server owners to scarz. He has no obligation or incentive to make this happen, especially when bungee server owners are either a business for profit, or small network for close friends.

@RedAISkye
Copy link

@BillyGalbreath Then he can put up the Bungee version as a premium plugin. That way, he can earn money as well.

@BillyGalbreath
Copy link
Contributor

BillyGalbreath commented Nov 9, 2017

Then it becomes a business and comes with obligations and liabilities. I don't think that is his goal, which is smart, imho. Not to mention dealing with pirates and leakers, etc.

Just calm your tits and enjoy this free software as it is available to you. Or dont. Up to you.

Making back handed threats is not only annoying, but counterproductive for you. ;)

@RedAISkye
Copy link

@BillyGalbreath It is not a threat. Many people requested the feature. If he doesn't want to develop this then he can just close this issue. He doesn't need to give us excuses like "For every comment this issue gets, this will be delayed by a month"

@BillyGalbreath
Copy link
Contributor

I don't believe you have fully read what I've said. I stated he is making this feature, and has even already started on it. So stop bugging. There is no ETA. There is no progress report, other than viewing the github branch yourself to see the progress. His reply is not an excuse, it is a vent from frustration out of being annoyed by this ticket, especially since it's a stupid feature request that doesn't need to be made (since the bot work fine on bungee).

I'll use short sentences to recap for you in case that didn't sink in: It's in progress. There is no ETA. So stop pestering.

@RedAISkye
Copy link

@BillyGalbreath No one said it doesn't work on Bungee, the feature is just to remove the unnecessary load on servers, unnecessary copy paste so it will be user friendly. No one is asking for the ETA, people were only supporting this issue like the developer said, he's not motivated to do this as there are not many users who want it. Telling us that this feature would only get delayed a whole month just if someone comments on this issue is just disappointing and doesn't make sense.
This whole thing could've been handled by just saying that he's working on this feature already.
Anyway, I don't have a problem anymore and I don't really care about this feature as I've retired from server development, If I need it, I'll develop it myself for personal use.

@BillyGalbreath
Copy link
Contributor

BillyGalbreath commented Nov 9, 2017

Like I said earlier. This whole ticket is to push the load away from the server owners and onto the plugin developer. That's just stupid, especially seeing bungee requires a whole new rewrite because of the way chat is handled, not even considering all the chat plugin hooks that run on each server. Anyone ever thought about that? How is a bungee discord plugin supposed to know which chat messages to intercept if the chat plugin is on the server instead of proxy? It would require a DiscordSRV bukkit plugin to be installed on each server anyways, and add more load and network congestion to communicate that data back to the mother instance running on bungee before it can even send the chat to discord... Which negates any ease of load you think you will get from having a bungee instance in the first place. All because you felt lazy and didn't want to copy paste a few configs on initial setup. Good job.

@RedAISkye
Copy link

@BillyGalbreath Then answer me, wouldn't it be more better if it was user friendly? Users having to copy paste the same thing in every single server is unnecessary and no, the point of supporting Bungee means that the config would be on bungeecord and you can just manage the whole plugin from there and the configuration. Putting the DSRV bukkit plugin is just for the chat so it's simple as it wouldn't require you to configure it on every server as it would be done in the bungeecord.
It's not lazy, it's a bad way of managing a plugin just like say, you have duplicate code in a project so you just make a separate method and call that method. Also, the placeholders, question yourself on why they exist and why we use them, for ease of use as if you have tons of lines where there would be the same thing then you can just use placeholders and edit one thing to update everything else which uses it.
The feature is just to make it ease of use and to remove duplicate making it user friendly.

@BillyGalbreath
Copy link
Contributor

A.k.a. you're lazy and want scarz to do all the work while you sit back and let your server make a profit. Got it.

@RedAISkye
Copy link

@BillyGalbreath Yeah right, it's difficult to develop an actual server where there are active players and also takes a lot of money as you need to pay for the dedicated 24/7 hosting and stuff. It's even more difficult to get active players and then hope to get donations which won't even be close enough to half the amount of what it costs for a dedicated server. I already have experienced it as I used to work on the server, AcidCraft Network. They made 0$ while have few active members and now, it has been shutdown.
He's a developer, he should enjoy programming. If it's "a lot of work" for him then he can simply decide to not do it in the first place so why you sucking his dick so much? No one here is begging for this feature, they only recommended it because it makes things easier to manage.
I don't have any problem with him developing it or not.

@Scarsz
Copy link
Member

Scarsz commented Nov 9, 2017

Locking this thread because of lack of decent discussion. It's being worked on. The entire plugin has to be rewritten and frameworks have to be made for the transition to go smoothly. No ETA. What @BillyGalbreath said is more/less right. @RedEyedRocker calm your tits. WICKED is good.

@DiscordSRV DiscordSRV locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 9, 2017
@Scarsz Scarsz pinned this issue Dec 21, 2018
@Dinty1 Dinty1 added the Ascension: Planned Planned for implementation in DiscordSRV v2 (Ascension) label Oct 7, 2023
@Vankka Vankka removed this from the v2.0.0 milestone Apr 13, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Ascension: Planned Planned for implementation in DiscordSRV v2 (Ascension) enhancement platform
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests