Typo in asymmetric coupling section of qubits 101

[amopremcak]

Equation (86) (the flux quantization condition) and the definition of \delta_L in terms of \delta in the line that follows are inconsistent with equation (87) (dc current through the SQUID in terms of \delta). The expression for \delta_R would equal \delta + (3/2)*\phi as opposed to \delta - \phi/2 as equation (87) suggests.

[amopremcak]

Also, I am having difficulties reproducing equation (88). To zeroth order in \phi, I can derive an expression which differs by yours by a factor of -1/2. The minus sign is because I used \delta_L = \delta - \phi/2 (which is what I think you meant to do). The factor of 1/2 is because only one of the terms in my expression for dI/d\phi contributes in a zeroth order expansion of \phi. In general, my expression for dI/d\phi is given below

[DanielSank]

Working through this myself again, I get

[amopremcak]

Sounds like we gotta beer bet this one. Below is a pdf of my derivation of the equation abover. Perhaps I am messing up a sign or something:
dc_squid_drive.pdf