Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Blobtools for symbiosis #90

Open
Sandrine3 opened this issue Jul 29, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Blobtools for symbiosis #90

Sandrine3 opened this issue Jul 29, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@Sandrine3
Copy link

Hi,

I have been using blobtools to plot the diversity of symbiotic bacteria found in a plant. Everything seems to work great, the .bam file shows about 98% mapped reads depending on sample. However, when I get to plot the results, the coverage plot that is produced shows about 50% mapped reads. Why the difference?

Thank you very much for your support!
Sandrine

nostoc_blob_M2 blobDB json bestsum order p7 span 100 noscale blobplot cumulative read_cov bam0

@Huangtianyu-caas
Copy link

Hi,

I got the same problem that the Unmapped rate is so high, and I don't know why. Do you have any update?

My best,

Tianyu

@DRL
Copy link
Owner

DRL commented Dec 8, 2020

Hi both,

this is how coverage parsing works: https://blobtools.readme.io/docs/coverage-parsing#1-bam-files

So i would assume that the difference is due to reads that map in supplementary/secondary alignments

cheers,

dom

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants